Top Loading Petroleum Arm Market Report – Research, Industry Analysis Reports and Market Demands

Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Market 2026 by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2032

Request for Sample of this report

Buy now

Table of Content

1 Market Overview

1.1 Product Overview and Scope
1.2 Market Estimation Caveats and Base Year
1.3 Market Analysis by Type
- 1.3.1 Overview: Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value by Type: 2021 Versus 2025 Versus 2032
- 1.3.2 Open Top Loading Arm
- 1.3.3 Semi-Closed Top Loading Arm
- 1.3.4 Fully Closed Top Loading Arm
1.4 Market Analysis by Arm Configuration
- 1.4.1 Overview: Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value by Arm Configuration: 2021 Versus 2025 Versus 2032
- 1.4.2 Fixed Reach Loading Arm
- 1.4.3 Variable Reach Loading Arm
1.5 Market Analysis by Application
- 1.5.1 Overview: Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value by Application: 2021 Versus 2025 Versus 2032
- 1.5.2 Refineries
- 1.5.3 Oil Storage and Distribution
- 1.5.4 Industrial Fuel Receiving
- 1.5.5 Others
1.6 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Market Size & Forecast
- 1.6.1 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value (2021 & 2025 & 2032)
- 1.6.2 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity (2021-2032)
- 1.6.3 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Average Price (2021-2032)

2 Manufacturers Profiles

3 Competitive Environment: Top Loading Petroleum Arm by Manufacturer

3.1 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Manufacturer (2021-2026)
3.2 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Revenue by Manufacturer (2021-2026)
3.3 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Average Price by Manufacturer (2021-2026)
3.4 Market Share Analysis (2025)
- 3.4.1 Producer Shipments of Top Loading Petroleum Arm by Manufacturer Revenue ($MM) and Market Share (%): 2025
- 3.4.2 Top 3 Top Loading Petroleum Arm Manufacturer Market Share in 2025
- 3.4.3 Top 6 Top Loading Petroleum Arm Manufacturer Market Share in 2025
3.5 Top Loading Petroleum Arm Market: Overall Company Footprint Analysis
- 3.5.1 Top Loading Petroleum Arm Market: Region Footprint
- 3.5.2 Top Loading Petroleum Arm Market: Company Product Type Footprint
- 3.5.3 Top Loading Petroleum Arm Market: Company Product Application Footprint
3.6 New Market Entrants and Barriers to Market Entry
3.7 Mergers, Acquisition, Agreements, and Collaborations

4 Consumption Analysis by Region

4.1 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Market Size by Region
- 4.1.1 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Region (2021-2032)
- 4.1.2 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value by Region (2021-2032)
- 4.1.3 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Average Price by Region (2021-2032)
4.2 North America Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value (2021-2032)
4.3 Europe Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value (2021-2032)
4.4 Asia-Pacific Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value (2021-2032)
4.5 South America Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value (2021-2032)
4.6 Middle East & Africa Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value (2021-2032)

5 Market Segment by Type

5.1 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Type (2021-2032)
5.2 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value by Type (2021-2032)
5.3 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Average Price by Type (2021-2032)

6 Market Segment by Application

6.1 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Application (2021-2032)
6.2 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value by Application (2021-2032)
6.3 Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm Average Price by Application (2021-2032)

7 North America

7.1 North America Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Type (2021-2032)
7.2 North America Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Application (2021-2032)
7.3 North America Top Loading Petroleum Arm Market Size by Country
- 7.3.1 North America Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Country (2021-2032)
- 7.3.2 North America Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value by Country (2021-2032)
- 7.3.3 United States Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)
- 7.3.4 Canada Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)
- 7.3.5 Mexico Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)

8 Europe

8.1 Europe Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Type (2021-2032)
8.2 Europe Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Application (2021-2032)
8.3 Europe Top Loading Petroleum Arm Market Size by Country
- 8.3.1 Europe Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Country (2021-2032)
- 8.3.2 Europe Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value by Country (2021-2032)
- 8.3.3 Germany Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)
- 8.3.4 France Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)
- 8.3.5 United Kingdom Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)
- 8.3.6 Russia Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)
- 8.3.7 Italy Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)

9 Asia-Pacific

9.1 Asia-Pacific Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Type (2021-2032)
9.2 Asia-Pacific Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Application (2021-2032)
9.3 Asia-Pacific Top Loading Petroleum Arm Market Size by Region
- 9.3.1 Asia-Pacific Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Region (2021-2032)
- 9.3.2 Asia-Pacific Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value by Region (2021-2032)
- 9.3.3 China Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)
- 9.3.4 Japan Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)
- 9.3.5 South Korea Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)
- 9.3.6 India Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)
- 9.3.7 Southeast Asia Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)
- 9.3.8 Australia Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)

10 South America

10.1 South America Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Type (2021-2032)
10.2 South America Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Application (2021-2032)
10.3 South America Top Loading Petroleum Arm Market Size by Country
- 10.3.1 South America Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Country (2021-2032)
- 10.3.2 South America Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value by Country (2021-2032)
- 10.3.3 Brazil Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)
- 10.3.4 Argentina Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)

11 Middle East & Africa

11.1 Middle East & Africa Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Type (2021-2032)
11.2 Middle East & Africa Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Application (2021-2032)
11.3 Middle East & Africa Top Loading Petroleum Arm Market Size by Country
- 11.3.1 Middle East & Africa Top Loading Petroleum Arm Sales Quantity by Country (2021-2032)
- 11.3.2 Middle East & Africa Top Loading Petroleum Arm Consumption Value by Country (2021-2032)
- 11.3.3 Turkey Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)
- 11.3.4 Egypt Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)
- 11.3.5 Saudi Arabia Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)
- 11.3.6 South Africa Market Size and Forecast (2021-2032)

12 Market Dynamics

12.1 Top Loading Petroleum Arm Market Drivers
12.2 Top Loading Petroleum Arm Market Restraints
12.3 Top Loading Petroleum Arm Trends Analysis
12.4 Porters Five Forces Analysis
- 12.4.1 Threat of New Entrants
- 12.4.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
- 12.4.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
- 12.4.4 Threat of Substitutes
- 12.4.5 Competitive Rivalry

13 Raw Material and Industry Chain

13.1 Raw Material of Top Loading Petroleum Arm and Key Manufacturers
13.2 Manufacturing Costs Percentage of Top Loading Petroleum Arm
13.3 Top Loading Petroleum Arm Production Process
13.4 Industry Value Chain Analysis

14 Shipments by Distribution Channel

14.1 Sales Channel
- 14.1.1 Direct to End-User
- 14.1.2 Distributors
14.2 Top Loading Petroleum Arm Typical Distributors
14.3 Top Loading Petroleum Arm Typical Customers

15 Research Findings and Conclusion

16 Appendix

16.1 Methodology
16.2 Research Process and Data Source

Description

According to our (Global Info Research) latest study, the global Top Loading Petroleum Arm market size was valued at US$ 109 million in 2025 and is forecast to a readjusted size of US$ 145 million by 2032 with a CAGR of 4.1% during review period.
Top Loading Petroleum Arm is a rigid-pipe fluid transfer device installed at a land-based loading rack to transfer petroleum products through the upper manhole or a fixed top connection of a road tanker or rail tank car. It typically consists of a riser, inboard arm, outboard arm, swivel joints, a balancing mechanism, a drop pipe or drop hose, a loading valve, and connection or sealing components. Multiple swivel planes and the balancing system allow the arm to move vertically and horizontally and to be positioned over the tanker, enabling the drop pipe to enter an open manhole or the arm end to connect to a sealed top fitting and establish a continuous transfer path between the terminal pipeline and the transport tank. The equipment is primarily used for the top loading or unloading of gasoline, diesel, kerosene, naphtha, lubricating oils, and other petroleum products, and may be designed as a fixed-reach, long-reach, telescopic, or boom-type system according to vehicle positioning, tank height, product properties, and loading requirements. It may support open loading, closed loading, or vapor-recovery loading and can be equipped with a telescopic drop pipe, sealing cone, vapor return line, level detection, overfill interlock, grounding, emergency shutoff, and heating or insulation devices to improve operational flexibility and reduce the risks of splashing, vapor release, static accumulation, and product leakage.
Key Findings
Global shipments are estimated at approximately 5,700 units in 2025
The global weighted average selling price is estimated at approximately US$18,600 per unit
Asia-Pacific remains the largest regional market
Open loading arms lead unit shipments while semi-closed and fully closed systems continue gaining share
Oil storage and distribution terminals represent the largest downstream application
Market Trends
Top Loading Petroleum Arms are evolving from manually balanced open-fill equipment toward lower-emission, closed-transfer and digitally monitored loading systems. Vapor-return piping, vapor cones, inflatable or mechanical hatch seals and fixed top couplings are increasingly integrated into gasoline and light-product loading racks to control volatile organic compound emissions and reduce product losses. Overfill detection, grounding verification, arm-position monitoring, emergency shutoff and terminal control-system connectivity are becoming standard requirements in new and upgraded installations. Product development is also moving toward pneumatic, hydraulic and electric actuation, automatic manhole recognition and remote positioning, particularly where customers seek to reduce operator exposure on elevated platforms. Technip Energies Loading Systems has introduced electric and automatic loading-arm technologies, while established land-loading suppliers provide vapor-recovery, instrumentation, heating and powered-operation options. Modular designs that allow swivel joints, seals, drop pipes and balance mechanisms to be serviced without replacing the complete arm are gaining importance because customers increasingly evaluate lifetime operating cost rather than initial equipment price alone.
Market Dynamics
Drivers
Demand is supported by the construction and modernization of refineries, petroleum terminals, pipeline depots, rail loading facilities and regional fuel-distribution infrastructure. Although the long-term outlook for refined-product consumption is moderate, the International Energy Agency expects substantial new refining capacity through the end of the decade, with additions concentrated in Asia, particularly China and India. Environmental and occupational-safety requirements are also creating replacement demand, as gasoline loading racks increasingly require vapor collection, vapor-tight transport tanks, leak detection and controlled loading operations. Aging loading arms require periodic replacement of swivel joints, seals, balance systems and structural components, and in many cases terminal operators replace complete arms when upgrading loading capacity, vehicle coverage or vapor-control performance.
Restraints
The principal structural restraint is competition from bottom-loading systems, especially at standardized high-throughput road-fuel terminals in North America and Europe. Bottom loading allows operators to work at ground level, supports simultaneous filling of multiple tanker compartments and can be readily integrated with vapor recovery, reducing the attractiveness of new top-loading installations for conventional gasoline and diesel fleets. Top-loading arms also require elevated loading platforms, fall-protection systems and accurate management of vehicle height and manhole location. Petroleum-sector capital expenditure is cyclical, and global refinery investment remained weak in 2025, causing some terminal modernization projects to be delayed. Long equipment life and the ability to repair swivel joints and balance assemblies further limit recurring new-unit demand in mature markets.
Opportunities
The largest opportunity lies in upgrading existing open top-loading racks rather than constructing entirely new conventional loading stations. Retrofitting vapor-recovery lines, sealing cones, overfill probes, grounding interlocks, automatic shutdown devices and arm-position sensors allows terminal operators to improve emissions performance and safety while retaining existing platforms and piping infrastructure. Variable-reach and long-boom systems offer additional potential in railcar loading, multi-compartment road tankers and facilities with inconsistent vehicle positioning. Emerging-market terminals provide demand for durable and competitively priced mechanical arms, while developed markets offer higher-value opportunities for fully closed, powered and automated systems. Electrically driven arms, predictive-maintenance monitoring and automatic tanker-interface positioning could also expand the addressable market where customers seek unmanned or low-manning loading operations.
Challenges
Top Loading Petroleum Arms are frequently engineered to match a specific loading rack, tanker envelope, product temperature, pipe diameter, pressure class and required reach, limiting full product standardization. Manufacturers must ensure compatibility among structural loads, swivel-joint torque, balance forces, drop-pipe length and operator handling requirements. Seal selection is critical because petroleum composition, additives, temperature and cleaning procedures can affect elastomer life and leakage performance. Suppliers also face varying regional standards for hazardous-area equipment, emissions, grounding, overfill protection and pressure containment. Installation errors, poor vehicle spotting and insufficient maintenance can cause excessive loads on swivel joints or damage to tanker manholes. The market therefore requires local engineering, commissioning, spare-parts availability and long-term maintenance support, creating barriers for suppliers without an established service network.
Industry Chain Analysis
The upstream supply chain includes carbon-steel, stainless-steel and aluminum pipes, cast or forged swivel-joint components, bearings, springs, counterweights, hydraulic and pneumatic cylinders, valves, elastomer and fluoropolymer seals, flexible hoses, insulation materials and electrical instrumentation. Swivel joints, sealing systems and balance mechanisms are the most technically important purchased or internally manufactured components because they directly affect movement, leakage control and operating life. Midstream manufacturers undertake mechanical design, working-envelope analysis, welding and machining, assembly, pressure testing, hazardous-area electrical integration and project-specific documentation. Some suppliers provide only individual loading arms, while larger participants also deliver metering skids, vapor-return systems, control panels, access platforms and turnkey loading-rack packages. Downstream customers include refineries, petroleum storage terminals, pipeline and rail depots, fuel distributors, airports, mining operations, power plants and industrial fuel users. Engineering customization, safety integration, installation, commissioning, spare parts and lifecycle service account for a significant portion of value creation beyond the fabricated pipe assembly itself.
Segment Insights
By sealing configuration, Open Top Loading Arms remain the largest category by shipment volume because of their simple structure, lower acquisition cost and extensive installed base in diesel, fuel oil, lubricating oil and less emission-sensitive applications. A rigid or telescopic drop pipe is inserted through the tanker manhole, with the outlet generally positioned near the bottom of the tank to reduce splashing and static generation. Semi-Closed Top Loading Arms are gaining share in gasoline, naphtha and other volatile-product applications. These systems normally combine a drop pipe with a vapor cone, sealing plate or similar hatch-sealing device and a separate vapor-return passage. Fully Closed Top Loading Arms connect mechanically to a fixed tanker interface and represent a smaller but higher-value segment used where leakage, vapor exposure or pressure containment requirements are more demanding.
By working-range design, Fixed Reach Loading Arms account for the majority of unit demand in loading positions where the tanker or railcar can be accurately spotted. Their relatively simple arm geometry supports lower cost, easier balancing and reduced maintenance. Variable Reach Loading Arms cover scissor, pantograph, unsupported boom, supported boom and other extended-range designs. These products can reach multiple tanker compartments or compensate for a wider range of vehicle positions without repeated vehicle movement. Variable-reach products generally carry higher average selling prices because they require additional swivel joints, structural support, balance capacity and engineering. The segment is expected to increase its value share as terminals prioritize operational flexibility, railcar coverage and reduced vehicle repositioning.
Downstream Market Opportunities
Oil storage and distribution is the largest downstream market, covering bulk fuel terminals, pipeline depots, regional tank farms and road or rail loading stations. These customers generate both new-equipment and recurring replacement demand because loading arms operate at high frequency and are exposed to seal wear, mechanical fatigue and changing regulatory requirements. Refineries represent another important application, particularly for transferring multiple grades of refined product, intermediate streams and heavy products requiring heat tracing or insulation. Industrial fuel receiving includes power generation, mining, manufacturing, aviation and other large fuel consumers that unload petroleum products from railcars or tank trucks into on-site storage. The strongest value opportunities are associated with volatile products requiring vapor recovery, heated heavy oils, railcar loading with large positional variation and terminals seeking automated or remotely monitored loading operations.
Regional Insights
Asia-Pacific is the largest regional market. The region combines a large refining and petroleum-distribution base with continuing investment in China, India and Southeast Asia and a comparatively broad use of top loading for road and rail transport. China has developed a substantial domestic manufacturing cluster capable of supplying standard manual arms, vapor-recovery models, loading skids and automatic positioning systems at competitive prices. Japan remains a technically mature market led by specialized suppliers serving domestic refinery, chemical and energy infrastructure. New refining capacity expected in Asia through 2030 supports continued demand, although project schedules remain sensitive to refining margins and national fuel policies.
North America is a mature replacement and retrofit market characterized by extensive use of bottom loading for standardized road-fuel distribution, but top loading remains established in railcar, industrial, heavy-product and special-transfer applications. Recent US gasoline-terminal requirements reinforce demand for vapor collection, tank-truck tightness and leak management. Europe is also a mature market, with demand increasingly concentrated in closed loading, emissions upgrades, rail applications and replacement of aging equipment. The Middle East benefits from refinery, storage and export-terminal investments, while Latin America and Africa offer selective opportunities tied to fuel-distribution expansion and modernization of older loading racks.
Competitive Landscape Analysis
The global market combines diversified international loading-system groups, specialized land-loading manufacturers and regional cost-competitive suppliers. Technip Energies Loading Systems, Emco Wheaton, OPW Engineered Systems and SVT form the core international group, supported by broad engineering capabilities, proprietary swivel and balancing technologies, global project references and lifecycle service networks. Woodfield Systems International, Kanon Loading Equipment, Dixon Valve & Coupling and JLA Loading Technology compete through specialized product design, customization and regional service. Chinese participants include Lianyungang Tianbang Technology Development, COSCO Lianyungang, Hubei Hongyi Intelligent Equipment, Jiangsu Changlong Petrochemical Equipment, Lianyungang Huade Petrochemical Machinery and Lianyungang Huatai Petro-Chemical Machinery. Competition is based on working-range design, swivel-joint reliability, vapor-control performance, automation, material compatibility, delivery time and aftermarket support rather than on equipment price alone. International suppliers are stronger in complex closed, heated and automated projects, while Chinese manufacturers have advantages in cost-sensitive standard equipment and integrated loading-rack packages.
Report Scope
This report is a detailed and comprehensive analysis for global Top Loading Petroleum Arm market. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses are presented by manufacturers, by region & country, by Type and by Application. As the market is constantly changing, this report explores the competition, supply and demand trends, as well as key factors that contribute to its changing demands across many markets. Company profiles and product examples of selected competitors, along with market share estimates of some of the selected leaders for the year 2025, are provided.
Key Features:
Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm market size and forecasts, in consumption value ($ Million), sales quantity (Units), and average selling prices (K US$/Unit), 2021-2032
Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm market size and forecasts by region and country, in consumption value ($ Million), sales quantity (Units), and average selling prices (K US$/Unit), 2021-2032
Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm market size and forecasts, by Type and by Application, in consumption value ($ Million), sales quantity (Units), and average selling prices (K US$/Unit), 2021-2032
Global Top Loading Petroleum Arm market shares of main players, shipments in revenue ($ Million), sales quantity (Units), and ASP (K US$/Unit), 2021-2026
The Primary Objectives in This Report Are:
To determine the size of the total market opportunity of global and key countries
To assess the growth potential for Top Loading Petroleum Arm
To forecast future growth in each product and end-use market
To assess competitive factors affecting the marketplace
This report profiles key players in the global Top Loading Petroleum Arm market based on the following parameters - company overview, sales quantity, revenue, price, gross margin, product portfolio, geographical presence, and key developments. Key companies covered as a part of this study include Technip Energies Loading Systems, Emco Wheaton, OPW Engineered Systems, SVT, Woodfield Systems International, Kanon Loading Equipment, Dixon Valve & Coupling, JLA Loading Technology, Lianyungang Tianbang Technology Development, COSCO (Lianyungang), etc.
This report also provides key insights about market drivers, restraints, opportunities, new product launches or approvals.
Top Loading Petroleum Arm market is split by Type and by Application. For the period 2021-2032, the growth among segments provides accurate calculations and forecasts for consumption value by Type, and by Application in terms of volume and value. This analysis can help you expand your business by targeting qualified niche markets.
Market Segmentation
Market segment by Type
Open Top Loading Arm
Semi-Closed Top Loading Arm
Fully Closed Top Loading Arm
Market segment by Arm Configuration
Fixed Reach Loading Arm
Variable Reach Loading Arm
Market segment by Application
Refineries
Oil Storage and Distribution
Industrial Fuel Receiving
Others
Major players covered
Technip Energies Loading Systems
Emco Wheaton
OPW Engineered Systems
SVT
Woodfield Systems International
Kanon Loading Equipment
Dixon Valve & Coupling
JLA Loading Technology
Lianyungang Tianbang Technology Development
COSCO (Lianyungang)
Hubei Hongyi Intelligent Equipment
Jiangsu Changlong Petrochemical Equipment
Lianyungang Huade Petrochemical Machinery
Lianyungang Huatai Petro-Chemical Machinery
Market segment by region, regional analysis covers
North America (United States, Canada, and Mexico)
Europe (Germany, France, United Kingdom, Russia, Italy, and Rest of Europe)
Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Southeast Asia, and Australia)
South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Rest of South America)
Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, South Africa, and Rest of Middle East & Africa)
Chapter Outline
Chapter 1, to describe Top Loading Petroleum Arm product scope, market overview, market estimation caveats and base year.
Chapter 2, to profile the top manufacturers of Top Loading Petroleum Arm, with price, sales quantity, revenue, and global market share of Top Loading Petroleum Arm from 2021 to 2026.
Chapter 3, the Top Loading Petroleum Arm competitive situation, sales quantity, revenue, and global market share of top manufacturers are analyzed emphatically by landscape contrast.
Chapter 4, the Top Loading Petroleum Arm breakdown data are shown at the regional level, to show the sales quantity, consumption value, and growth by regions, from 2021 to 2032.
Chapter 5 and 6, to segment the sales by Type and by Application, with sales market share and growth rate by Type, by Application, from 2021 to 2032.
Chapter 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, to break the sales data at the country level, with sales quantity, consumption value, and market share for key countries in the world, from 2021 to 2026.and Top Loading Petroleum Arm market forecast, by regions, by Type, and by Application, with sales and revenue, from 2027 to 2032.
Chapter 12, market dynamics, drivers, restraints, trends, and Porters Five Forces analysis.
Chapter 13, the key raw materials and key suppliers, and industry chain of Top Loading Petroleum Arm.
Chapter 14 and 15, to describe Top Loading Petroleum Arm sales channel, distributors, customers, research findings and conclusion.

Buy now