This report focuses on the global Pipeline Integrity Management status, future forecast, growth opportunity, key market and key players. The study objectives are to present the Pipeline Integrity Management development in United States, Europe and China.
Pipeline Integrity Management (PIM) is the cradle-to-grave approach of understanding and operating pipelines in a safe, reliable manner.
Increase in average well depth Increase in oil & gas production, growing complexity of reservoir conditions, increased shale exploration is expected to fuel the demand for pipeline integrity management across the globe. Furthermore, necessity of asset integrity management in new offshore fields in deep waters, Stringent government safety regulations and quality control requirements and declining oil and gas prices increasing the demand for maintaining pipeline is expected to fuel the demand for pipeline integrity management market.
In 2017, the global Pipeline Integrity Management market size was xx million US$ and it is expected to reach xx million US$ by the end of 2025, with a CAGR of xx% during 2018-2025.
The key players covered in this study
Market segment by Type, the product can be split into
Market segment by Application, split into
Market segment by Regions/Countries, this report covers
Central & South America
The study objectives of this report are:
To analyze global Pipeline Integrity Management status, future forecast, growth opportunity, key market and key players.
To present the Pipeline Integrity Management development in United States, Europe and China.
To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their development plan and strategies.
To define, describe and forecast the market by product type, market and key regions.
In this study, the years considered to estimate the market size of Pipeline Integrity Management are as follows:
History Year: 2013-2017
Base Year: 2017
Estimated Year: 2018
Forecast Year 2018 to 2025
For the data information by region, company, type and application, 2017 is considered as the base year. Whenever data information was unavailable for the base year, the prior year has been considered.